Title |
Evaluation of anterior maxilla bone condition using CBCT for placing dental implant
|
Authors |
Nureldeen AN Elhammali1, Pushkar Gupta2,*, Sohini Deb3, Amit Chhaparwal4, Rinkee Mohanty5, Samarth Tiwari6 & R. Naveen Reddy7
|
Affiliation |
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Sirte University, Libya; 2Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital, Jabalpur, MP, India; 3Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India; 4Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Geetanjali Dental College & Research Institute, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India; 5Department of Periodontics, Institute Of Dental Sciences, SOA Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India; 6Department of Periodontics, Index Institute of Dental Sciences, Malawanchal University, Indore, MP, India; 7Department of Prosthodontics, College o-f Dentistry, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia. *Corresponding author
|
|
Nureldeen AN Elhammali - E - mail: nurdentnur@yahoo.com; Phone no: + 00218911361480 Pushkar Gupta - E - mail: drpushkar1@gmail.com; Phone no: +91 9406538208 Sohini Deb - E - mail: sohinimishti03@gmail.com; Phone no: +91 7595843548 Amit Chhaparwal - E - mail: dr.achhaparwal@gmail.com; Phone no: +91 9462889987 Rinkee Mohanty - E - mail: rinkeemohanty@soa.ac.in; Phone no: +91 9848707761 Samarth Tiwari - E - mail: samarthtiwari@yahoo.com; Phone no: +91 8319507418 R Naveen Reddy - E - mail: E-mail: drnaveenramireddy@gmail.com; Phone no: +9665090323373 |
Article Type |
Research Article
|
Date |
Received September 1, 2024; Revised September 30, 2024; Accepted September 30, 2024, Published September 30, 2024
|
Abstract |
Careful planning is essential for a successful outcome of dental implants. Determining the size of the implant and placement angle requires precise knowledge of the alveolar bone's height, width, shape, and density surrounding the intended implant location. Hence the goal of the current research was to use cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to evaluate the anterior maxilla's bone state for dental implant insertion. The study included 30 patients, both male and female, who had CBCT scans of their anterior maxilla and needed dental implants in their maxillary anterior teeth. Measuring parameters included buccal undercut position and depth, as well as bone height and width. When comparing the canine region to the incisors, the mean bone height and width was higher. Buccal undercut, however, was more for the incisor region. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).
|
Keywords |
Bone, maxilla, dental implant, undercut
|
Citation |
Elhammali et al. Bioinformation 20(9): 1038-1041 (2024)
|
Edited by |
P Kangueane
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
Publisher |
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|