Title

Marginal bone loss in implant placement among Indian patients with fresh extraction socket

Authors

Manu Sharma¹,*, Srinivasulu Pabbaraju², Sabari Murugesan³, Praveen Gangadharappa⁴, Shyamalima Bhattacharyya⁵ & Subhash Chandra Pankaj⁶

Affiliation

¹Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, GMC, Saharanpur, India; ²Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Adiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India; ³Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; ⁴Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; ⁵Department of Public Health Dentistry, Government dental college, Dibrugarh, India; ⁶Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College, Raipur, Chattisgarh, India; *Corresponding author

Email

Manu Sharma – E-mail: dr.manu.oralsurgeon@gmail.com Phone: +91 9764214679Srinivasulu Pabbaraju – E-mail: dr.sreenivasa83@gmail.com, Phone: +91 8886900664Sabari Murugesan – E-mail: smurugsan@jazanu.edu.sa, Phone: +91 9865676563

Praveen Gangadharapp – E-mail: Pgowdara@jazanu.edu.sa, Phone: +91 9765753546

Shyamalima Bhattacharyya – E-mail: shyamlima113@gmail.com, Phone: +91 9898754323

Subhash Chandra Pankaj – E-mail: docsubhas23@gmail.com, Phone: +91 9630488848

Article Type

Research Article

Date

Received June 1, 2023; Revised June 30, 2023; Accepted June 30, 2023, Published June 30, 2023

It is of interest to examine the Marginal Bone Loss (MBL) around a single titanium implant that was immediately loaded and implanted in a healed or new extraction site in the maxilla over a period of five years. This study involved 36 participants (21 men and 15 women, with an average age of 31 years), all of whom needed to have a single implant placed in the front maxillae. The average marginal bone loss (MBL) in extraction sockets increased by 0.27±0.18 mm after a year, 0.26± 0.17 mm after three years, and 0.21 ±0.18 mm after five years. The mean change in MBL for the group of healed ridges was 0.27± 0.18 mm for one year, 0.22±0.18 mm for three years, and 0.21± 0.17mm for five years. Thus, implants loaded immediately and positioned in either healed ridges or extraction sockets had a similar effect on the local bone.

Keywords

Immediate implant, Fresh extracted socket, Marginal bone loss

Citation

Sharma et al. Bioinformation 19(6): 770-774 (2023)

Edited by

P Kangueane

ISSN

0973-2063

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.