BACK TO CONTENTS   |    PDF   |    PREVIOUS   |    NEXT

Title

 

 

 

 

A comparison of MSA tools

 

Authors

Nadia Essoussi1, Khaddouja Boujenfa1,* and Mohamed Limam1

 

Affiliation

1LARODEC, High Institute of Management, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia

 

Email

Khaddouja.Boujenfa@isg.rnu.tn; * Corresponding author

 

Article Type

Hypothesis

 

Date

received May 15, 2008; revised June 13, 2008; accepted July 06, 2008; published July 31, 2008

 

Abstract

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is essential in phylogenetic, evolutionary and functional analysis. Several MSA tools are available in the literature. Here, we use several MSA tools such as ClustalX, Align-m, T-Coffee, SAGA, ProbCons, MAFFT, MUSCLE and DIALIGN to illustrate comparative phylogenetic trees analysis for two datasets. Results show that there is no single MSA tool that consistently outperforms the rest in producing reliable phylogenetic trees.

 

Keywords

multiple sequence alignment methods; phylogenetic trees; Robinson-Foulds distance; Neighbor-Joining method

 

Citation

Essoussi et al., Bioinformation 2(9): 452-455 (2008)

 

Edited by

P. Kangueane

 

ISSN

0973-2063

 

Publisher

Biomedical Informatics

 

License

This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.