Title |
Comparative analysis of different impression techniques in relation to single tooth impression
|
Authors |
Aman Merchant, Subhabrata Maiti *, V. Ashok & Dhanraj M. Ganapathy
|
Affiliation |
Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha institute of medical and technical science, Saveetha University Chennai, India
|
|
Dr Subhabrata Maiti Email - subhabratamaiti.sdc@saveetha.com; Corresponding author*
|
Article Type |
Research Article
|
Date |
Received October 7, 2020; Revised October 27, 2020; Accepted October 27, 2020; Published December 31, 2020
|
Abstract |
It is of interest to compare the accuracy of three different
impression techniques for a single tooth impression. We used 3
groups with 15
samples each in this study. Group 1: Putty and light body in a
sectional stock tray; Group 2: Monophase and extra light body in a
sectional
|
Keywords |
Accuracy, Dimensional Stability, and Impressions
|
Citation |
Merchant et al. Bioinformation 16(12): 1105-1110 (2020)
|
Edited by |
P Kangueane
|
ISSN |
0973-2063
|
Publisher |
|
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
|
|