Title |
|
A comparison of MSA tools
|
Authors |
Nadia Essoussi1, Khaddouja Boujenfa1,* and Mohamed Limam1
| |
Affiliation |
1LARODEC, High Institute of Management, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| |
|
Khaddouja.Boujenfa@isg.rnu.tn; * Corresponding author
| |
Article Type |
Hypothesis
| |
Date |
received May 15, 2008; revised June 13, 2008; accepted July 06, 2008; published July 31, 2008
| |
Abstract |
Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is essential in phylogenetic, evolutionary and functional analysis. Several MSA tools are available in the literature. Here, we use several MSA tools such as ClustalX, Align-m, T-Coffee, SAGA, ProbCons, MAFFT, MUSCLE and DIALIGN to illustrate comparative phylogenetic trees analysis for two datasets. Results show that there is no single MSA tool that consistently outperforms the rest in producing reliable phylogenetic trees.
| |
Keywords |
multiple sequence alignment methods; phylogenetic trees; Robinson-Foulds distance; Neighbor-Joining method
| |
Citation |
Essoussi et al., Bioinformation 2(9): 452-455 (2008)
| |
Edited by |
P. Kangueane
| |
ISSN |
0973-2063
| |
Publisher |
| |
License |
This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. |